Acoustics

Understanding Sound Fields: Near, Close, Critical, and Reverberant Space in Acoustics

The Music Telegraph | Text 2025/10/24 [13:46]
Acoustics

Understanding Sound Fields: Near, Close, Critical, and Reverberant Space in Acoustics

The Music Telegraph| 입력 : 2025/10/24 [13:46]

© Wikimedia Commons



Understanding Sound Fields: Near, Close, Critical, and Reverberant Space in Acoustics

 

In acoustics, the way sound behaves depends heavily on distance from the source and the behavior of reflections in the environment. Engineers divide the acoustic space around a sound source into several "sound fileds", each defined by the relationship between direct sound (from the source itself) and reflected sound (from surfaces in the environment). Understanding these fields is essential in microphone placement, room design, and audio evaluation.

 

1. Near Field

The region extremely closd to the sound source, typically within a few inches from the speaker, instrument, or vibrating surface.

 

Characteristics:

Property Description
Sound type 100% direct sound; reflections are negligible
Pressure vs. Particle velocity Highly complex and non-uniform
Common in Loudspeaker cones, instrument bodies, vocal cords region

 

Practical Use:

  • Used in close-miking (vocals, guitar amps, drums)
  • Reduces environmental coloration
  • Preferred in noisy or reverberant rooms

 

 

2. Close Field

A little farther than the near field. Direct sound still dominates, but now the listener or microphone begins to receive some early reflections.

 

Characteristics:

  • Direct sound is still stronger than reflected sound
  • Listener can still clearly identify source localization
  • Early reflections begin to color the tone depending on room shape and surface material

 

Practical Use:

  • Standard for studio control room listening (nearfield monitors placed 3 - 5 feet away)
  • Helps minimize room influence without requiring a fully treated space

 

 

3. Critical Distance

The point in space where direct and reflected sound energy are equal (50/50). It forms the transition line between clarity-dominant and reverberation-dominant listening.

 

Factors affecting critical distance:

  • Room size
  • Absorption / diffusion of surfaces
  • Frequency (higher frequencies decay faster in reflections)

 

Typical Distances:

  • Small, treated studio: ~1 meter or less
  • Concert hall: several meters
  • Cathedral: tens of meters

 

Practical Significance:

  • Beyond this distance, speech intelligibility falls rapidly
  • Instrument tone loses articulation and becomes "room-heavy"
  • A major reference point for mic placement in orchestral recording

 

 

4. Reverberant Field

The region beyond the critical distance, where reflected sound dominates and direct sound becomes secondary.

 

Characteristics:

  • Spacious, diffuse sound
  • Localization of the source becomes less precise
  • Room tone and reverb envelope take over

 

Use Cases:

  • Capturing natural ambience
  • Choral / orchestral hall miking
  • Reverb profiling in impulse response measurements

 

 

* Far Field = 3 Combined Zones

The term "far field" in acoustics refers not to a single space, but to the region after the near field where the sound wave becomes stable and predictable. It is divided into three practical subzones:

 

Zone Dominant Sound Use Case
Close field Direct sound > Reflections Monitoring, close-miking
Critical distance Direct sound = Reflections Ideal acoustic transition point
Reverberant field Direct sound < Reflections Ambient capture

 

 

5. Free Field vs. Open Field

Type of Field Description Example
Free Field No reflections at all; only direct sound travels Anechoic chamber
Open Field One reflective surface present Outdoor environment above ground level (ground = single reflector)

 

In real-world environments, a perfect free field almost never exists, except in special testing environments like anechoic chambers. The open field is more realistic in natural acoustic measurements.

 

 

Why These Distinctions Matter

Application Relevance
Recording Mic technique changes depending on sound field dominance
Mixing Nearfield monitoring minimizes room coloration
Live sound reinforcement Avoid placing microphones beyond critical distance
Loudspeaker design Near-field vs. far-field measurement affects frquency response
Architectural acoustics Hall clarity depends on shaping critical distance

 

For musicians and engineers, working deliberately within these fields is the difference between an accurate, controlled recording and a muddy or overly reflective capture.

 

 

< Copyright ⓒ The Music Telegraph :: Prohibit reprinting and redistribution >
The Music Telegraph Another articles
Comment
  • 도배방지 이미지

광고
Most Read
1
Review #7 (Digital Audio)
2
‘Slooply’ - Creating music has never been easier!
3
Basic Waveforms of Synthesizer: Pulse Wave
4
Handcrafted Audio 'Handcrafted Piano': A Boutique Felt Piano and Analog-Inspired Synth Engine for Modern Composers, Powered by the Free Kontakt Player
5
StageBox Software 'StageBox': The Streamlined Standalone Plugin Host and Setlist Manager Delivering Studio-Quality Sound for Live Keyboard Players
6
Broadway Orchestra Wage Scales: What Musicians Earn
7
Apollo Sound ‘Middle East Deep House’: An Extra Unique and Authentic Arabic Deep House Sample Pack
8
Empirical Labs 'AROUSOR™ Rev 3': A Plugin that brings The Legendary Tone of its Analog Hardware with more Distressor-based Tones
9
Major Label Album Budget
10
Recording and Editing Human Voice (3): Panel Discussion Audio
광고
Acoustics (popular articles)
1
Understanding Sound Fields: Near, Close, Critical, and Reverberant Space in Acoustics
광고
Most Recent
Recording and Editing Human Voice (3): Panel Discussion Audio
Katz Praatz 'Jazz Sketch (ver. 1.5)': Sketch Your Music in Jazz
Understanding Sound Fields: Near, Close, Critical, and Reverberant Space in Acoustics
Inside the Recording Artist Agreement: A Guide for Musicians
Understanding Parallel Signal Patching
광고
광고
광고
광고
광고
광고
광고
광고
광고